Skip to main content

Brutal Murders and "Killers of the Flower Moon" Part two.



 We were speaking of Scorsese’s film. The first three quarters are difficult to follow—I told you Dear Reader, that this is an intricate tale. Yet, I believe he did his best. The film comes together in the final hour, with the arrival of the BOI guys (that's the "bureau of investigation," i.e. future g-men). With undercover agents and flat-out intimidation, these men are able to unravel a nasty story, involving William Hale (played with a galling, banal, evil by Robert Deniro), and his nephews (Leonardo DiCaprio plays one of them, Ernest Burkhart, a simpleton who becomes a willing participant in Hales’ schemes. His performance is pretty solid, but to my mind he used too many physical affectations when he didn’t need them. You judge, Dear Reader, and let me know what you think. I do have to point out that DiCaprio most likely used Marlon Brando’s trick of padding his mouth with something).

Lily Gladstone, who plays Molly Burkhart, does well as Ernest’s diabetic Osage wife. But, her performance, while powerful, lacked something. Perhaps she needed a part two.  For some reason, this film just didn’t adequately capture the horrific complexity of the story. But, what do I know—I’m not a filmmaker.

The film primarily deals with the deaths in Molly's circle, neglecting to do more than touch upon the dozens of others who were murdered for their mineral rights.  That doesn't seem at all fair to me, but when you're dealing with more than 60 murders, sometimes you have to distill the horror.  Something of the gruesome reality of life for the Osage in Oklahoma is still preserved in the film, including husbands murdering wives by slow poison, and blowing up people's houses with dynamite....



No, I'm not kidding, or insane, or orbiting planet Krypton.  No elegant Agatha Christie-style murders (like Atropine poisoning through eye drops) for these morons.  Let's just shoot them in the head and leave 'em on the side of the road, or subtly blow up their house with gallons of gas and dynamite.  SICKOS.

 The casual way in which the film depicts the murders, is well done, bu not enough time is spent on it.  As I said, the story was just too messy to hammer into a timeline.

What I can tell you, is that most of the mineral rights held by the Osage, ended up in the hands of whites:  white businesses, white churches, etc.  Sigh.  It's all so goddamned familiar.

I’m not going to tell you the film's ending--who died, who was incarcerated, or who was blown up in a freak laundry room accident (jk), but I can tell you that it was 'summed up'  in a REALLY weird way, with a fantastic 30's style radio broadcast.  

Yeah, I'm still trying to figure that one out.  No success so far.

I can also tell you that there was 'some justice,' but not nearly enough  Yet, perhaps the fact that this movie has been made is something to be grateful for--at least the story is finally being told in a medium that will reach millions, and hopefully become part of our American collective memory.  One can only hope.  Such things will happen again, it's inevitable, but we can do our part (as I mentioned previously), and honor the dead.  

********************


I don’t want you to think, dear reader, that I bemoan our nation’s past. We are very young, and like other societies we have had our extraordinarily dark moments. When you’re an historian, you have to look at the totality. Sometimes that’s the hardest thing to do.  Yet, I continue to hope, that we will blunder our way toward a better world, making responsible, humane decisions when it comes to this nations’ conduct all of our citizens, regardless of what they believe, or the color of their skin. After all, aren’t we or shouldn’t we be humans together? Is it possible for us to let each person make their own choice, as long as they don't do it with a machine gun or a bomb?  

It is in the hope of these things that I'll leave you--with this scene from the film "Amistad." For me, it shows that even with our guilty, bloody secrets 'we are who we were'---a country of basically decent, if flawed, human beings.  In spite of the horrors we continue to perpetrate on one another, I'll take the flaws every time.  What is it they say--strength through adversity? Well, what is life, if not that?  




It's Christmastide.  I say, let's try to have a little faith that we all have room to progress towards something better.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury...trying the Nazi bastard hierarchy....(2)

Every time I think about WW2, and its' aftermath, I think of this song by Dylan: Dylan lends gravitas to just about anything, don't you find?  And the sixties, when the song was written, were hard times, during which the 'hard rain' fell in the aftermath of World War II. And now back to our regularly scheduled broadcast, the Nurenberg trials. Now, let us further imagine that we had a chance to hold accountable some of the Nazis for the horrors seen at the concentration camps as they were liberated by the Allies   Additionally, the victors of World War II were hard pressed to understand in a cultural sense, both the German and Japanese Prisoners. Is difficult to ascertain how a society could have fallen under Hitler’s spell, but they did. It is also difficult to understand the Japanese response to external industrialisation. In their case, the code of Buchito made it possible for them to conquer so much of the Pacific Rim. As far as the German people are concerned, my ex...

Into the Minds of Moria: Hitler's good little orc, Reinhard Heydrich

Hannah Arendt, who wrote an account of the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem, characterized Nazism as "the banality of  evil."  What exactly does that mean? BANALITY:  "the quality of being boring, ordinary, and not original."   https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/banality  At least according to the Cambridge University dictionary.  But, do I agree with Arendt's use of that term? Yes and no.  Hitler's inner circle were extraordinarily ordinary men, not gifted with either intellect or extensive education (excepting perhaps Albert Speer).  And yet, these men were truly gifted in their collective hatred and paranoia ...of just about everything and everyone. But, there were special orcs,  even within the circle of Hitler's closest minions.  This is the story of one of the worst: Hitler’s favorite orc. All right.  You caught me.  That orc is actually from the World of Warcraft. OK. Let me introduce you to this f...

'Do You Deny then, Mr. Chivington, that you're a vicious psycho hose beast?' No sir, Mr. Congressman sir, I swear I didn't know there was anyone there! The tragic massacre at Sand Creek, 1864.

What images come to your mind, when you dream of the American West, Dear Reader? Something like this? I know that this is one of the more recognized fantasies about the western experience.  Hopefully by now, we all know that this depiction is COMPLETE bulls*&t. THERE WERE ALREADY PEOPLE THERE, FOLKS. When I think of the American western experience, I always have these images in my head: For my druthers, I prefer pictures like the above.  Images that compel impressions of space and wild beauty. Buffalo, coupled (of course) with that endless sky.  Whenever I think about the American West, I think poetically.  I think tectonically.  It's impossible to gage this landscape against the span of a single human life.  But, that is essentially what we have to do here, isn't it Dear Reader? We must create condensed sketches of larger events, even if those happenings are tragic in nature.    Which brings us to Sand Creek. The events surrounding the M...