Skip to main content

Sherlocked: which interpretation of the great detective do you like the best?

 Today is Halloween, and what better time to write about Sherlock Holmes?



Sherlock made his literary debut in 1887, with the short story "A Study in Scarlet."  The author was Conan Doyle (later to become "Sir").  Tales appeared in print until 1927.  Mostly, the lore of Sherlock and Watson comes in the form of short stories, with only a smattering of novels, here and there, but oh those short stories captured the imagination of many throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. Dozens of plays, movies, and books have since been created, since the first publication of Doyle's detective's adventures, and absolutely everyone who has ever seen a film adaptation of Sherlock has their favorite actor who portrays him.  

It's kind of like who is your favorite James Bond?

Sean Connery, ye gods!

As for me? I have always been a purist about Sherlock Holmes, and while I love Basil Rathbone's interpretation, I would have to say that Jeremy Brett comes the closest to the spirit of Doyle's amateur detective.  My mother prefers Basil.  So did my father.  I like Basil as well, but I feel that the producers took too many liberties with the stories.  But as I said, I'm a purist.

Having stated that, I do enjoy watching Benedict Cumberbatch, and Martin Freeman, the latest interpretation of the dynamic duo.  But, then who wouldn't like watching these oh - so - attractive men?

😁


But, Dear Reader, would you be interested to know that Doyle's character inspired a lot the techniques of what eventually become forensic science? After all, when Doyle was first writing these stories, police were just beginning to realize that one could possibly identify criminals, using the shapes of ears, and later fingerprints.  But Sherlock used his magnifying glass to seek out different forms of proof, such as footprints, candles that shed no wax when and if they were moved, and the dog who didn't bark in the night. Today, we would call that circumstantial evidence, and yet there were the beginnings of forensic detection in those stories, which make the fictional detective so popular, over one hundred years after his first appearance.

There is a great documentary on this subject (Amazon) called "How Sherlock Changed the World"
if you're at all curious.  

As for myself, I try to watch some Sherlock at least every month or so, just to keep my hand in.  I love his use of logic, and his cold pragmatism--good vs. evil in the most interesting way.  Sherlock is not necessarily purely good, however, he is something of an enigma--an uneasy combination of the two.  And yet, there is something of the modern anti-hero in his character that strikes me as so terribly modern, which is why I believe his character still translates so well to the audience of the present. 

To put it succinctly, I shall celebrate this Halloween by watching "The Hound of the Baskervilles" with Jeremy Brett, and I will hope, Dear Reader, that you have a safe, happy, and spooky holiday!


And, what Halloween would be complete without this? :)



I believe in the Great Pumpkin, don't you?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Into the Minds of Moria: Hitler's good little orc, Reinhard Heydrich

Hannah Arendt, who wrote an account of the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem, characterized Nazism as "the banality of  evil."  What exactly does that mean? BANALITY:  "the quality of being boring, ordinary, and not original."   https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/banality  At least according to the Cambridge University dictionary.  But, do I agree with Arendt's use of that term? Yes and no.  Hitler's inner circle were extraordinarily ordinary men, not gifted with either intellect or extensive education (excepting perhaps Albert Speer).  And yet, these men were truly gifted in their collective hatred and paranoia ...of just about everything and everyone. But, there were special orcs,  even within the circle of Hitler's closest minions.  This is the story of one of the worst: Hitler’s favorite orc. All right.  You caught me.  That orc is actually from the World of Warcraft. OK. Let me introduce you to this f...
Post a Comment
Read more

What would Wile E. Coyote say? Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

Do you remember this guy?   You know, Bugs, the Roadrunner, and Porky Pig? Yeah, well, Wile's IQ never did do him much good. Perhaps he was not a "super genius" after all--the poor guy kept getting blown up by a rabbit (over, and over, and over again). Enter ridiculous world with me, Dear Reader, (just for a second) and let's see if Wile's character traits help us at all to understand a dangerous little condition: Narcissistic Personality Disorder and what it might contribute to our understanding of the current Presidential horse race. Yes, we all know what a narcissist is, but what about this psychiatric disorder? Well, let's see what the Mayo Clinic says about this condition: Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental health condition in which people have an unreasonably high sense of their own importance. They need and seek too much attention and want people to admire them. People with this disorder may lack the ability to understand or care abou...
Post a Comment
Read more

'Do You Deny then, Mr. Chivington, that you're a vicious psycho hose beast?' No sir, Mr. Congressman sir, I swear I didn't know there was anyone there! The tragic massacre at Sand Creek, 1864.

What images come to your mind, when you dream of the American West, Dear Reader? Something like this? I know that this is one of the more recognized fantasies about the western experience.  Hopefully by now, we all know that this depiction is COMPLETE bulls*&t. THERE WERE ALREADY PEOPLE THERE, FOLKS. When I think of the American western experience, I always have these images in my head: For my druthers, I prefer pictures like the above.  Images that compel impressions of space and wild beauty. Buffalo, coupled (of course) with that endless sky.  Whenever I think about the American West, I think poetically.  I think tectonically.  It's impossible to gage this landscape against the span of a single human life.  But, that is essentially what we have to do here, isn't it Dear Reader? We must create condensed sketches of larger events, even if those happenings are tragic in nature.    Which brings us to Sand Creek. The events surrounding the M...
Post a Comment
Read more