I think it's time for a little hello to Hatshepsut.
When I was 12, I read a fictionalized romance on the life and loves of Queen Hatshepsut. I never forgot it. The story was largely about a romance between Senenmut and the Queen over the course of her reign. She was also one of the few women who usurped the exclusively male throne of Egypt for over two decades. An extraordinary accomplishment.
The chief daughter of Thutmose I, Hatshepsut was married to her half brother Thutmose II in her early teens. Now, what we would today call an adulterous relationship, and go ewwwww!, the royal Egyptians thought they were doing what they needed in order to keep the blood lines pure. Purity of royal blood lines was one way in which these royals could hold onto their power base, in a land prone to periodic civil war, incestuous marriage became one more way in which a family sustained their authority. In some sense, we have to leave our modern sensibilities behind, and embrace the mores of the ancient world. I am sure that were the positions reversed however, that past peoples would have a difficult time understanding our customs...I mean what in the hell would they think about Jack in the Box and french fries?
It is constantly this gap that the historian must breach, using both imagination and cunning.
For many years, the truth about what the English archaeologists named "Queen Hatasu" was relatively unknown. Of course she must have been a Queen, and never Pharoah! At least, this is what nineteenth century archaeologists believed. But among the Egyptological society in England of the mid to late 19th century, such assumptions were completely in character.
Alright. So what do we know about Hatshepsut? Was her rule prosperous? Yes. Was she a building pharoah? Yes. Did her people love her? We don't know, but everyone loves prosperity and peace, and Hatshepsut's reign had both.
One characteristic we can ascribe to most of the successful pharoahs in Egypt's past, are the many temples, funerary structures, and various monuments they left behind to impress the people and their successors. And Hatshepsut was no exception. Tradition holds that these monuments contained an entire wing of the Great Temple at Karnak, of which a great obelisk was but one feature. Do you have any bloody idea how hard it was to carve a stone which weighs a couple of tons, and then to erect it to be free standing? It was an architectural and engineering marvel, to be sure.
Not too B A D, eh? look at how these spires dominate, hell, subjugate the immediate environment! And it is not for just a show of her power, but rather a show of male power.
Come on. What else does an obelisk symbolize? Come on...
Recognize this one?
So, not just power, but male power. This was ultimately how she validated her authority with the people and Egypt's neighbors. And, let me tell you no one even today, knows how these obelisks were raised. However there is a great documentary with some interesting speculations...
Quite early in her reign, Thutmose II died, leaving his young queen and child the throne. She did not hesitate, and quickly moved to seize power into her own hands. This left her husband's only son, Thutmose III out in the cold, but he is reputed to have been a son of one of her husband's concubines, and so beneath her notice, perhaps. What exactly was their relationship? We don't really know. It's quite possible that they were not enemies, and that the young Pharaoh in waiting and his ruler were on pretty decent terms. Without HG Wells, we'll never know. What we do know is that Thutmose III acted in the background, sometimes as a general, sometimes as an advisor, for much of Hatshepsut's reign.
During her reign, her people prospered. She apparently ruled wisely. One of the highlights of her reign, was of a trade mission to an African kingdom known only as "Punt." The treasures brought back from this expedition were so unexpected and so wondrous, that they ended up on the walls of her funerary temple, Deir el Bahri.
Where was Punt exactly? No one knows exactly. And yet, we have 'proof' of her success here with the scenes of the returning trade mission:
Here, you have a servant carrying, what is probably a platter of spice, most likely myrrh. Look at the left hand side of the picture.
Spices (and no, not the Frank Herbert variety), exotic foods, and slaves. Such riches as few rulers see in their lifetime. It was such a successful expedition, that we still have documentation. Crazy, huh?
Hatshepsut also took part in wars, with Thutmose III likely acting as her general. Apparently, she was quite successful.
Under her watch, Egypt grew wealthy.
What makes her so interesting to me is the fact that she was truly gender neutral--something she was compelled to do, in order to sustain her power over her people.
such gender neutral images would make her exceptionally popular today, but again, served an expedient purpose back in the day. Patriarchy, remember?
So, why Hatshepsut? Simple. Deir el Bahri.
her intended funerary chambers...
not too shabby, eh? also reputed to have been designed by her lover/advisor Senenmut I.
Every time I think about WW2, and its' aftermath, I think of this song by Dylan: Dylan lends gravitas to just about anything, don't you find? And the sixties, when the song was written, were hard times, during which the 'hard rain' fell in the aftermath of World War II. And now back to our regularly scheduled broadcast, the Nurenberg trials. Now, let us further imagine that we had a chance to hold accountable some of the Nazis for the horrors seen at the concentration camps as they were liberated by the Allies Additionally, the victors of World War II were hard pressed to understand in a cultural sense, both the German and Japanese Prisoners. Is difficult to ascertain how a society could have fallen under Hitler’s spell, but they did. It is also difficult to understand the Japanese response to external industrialisation. In their case, the code of Buchito made it possible for them to conquer so much of the Pacific Rim. As far as the German people are concerned, my ex...
Hannah Arendt, who wrote an account of the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem, characterized Nazism as "the banality of evil." What exactly does that mean? BANALITY: "the quality of being boring, ordinary, and not original." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/banality At least according to the Cambridge University dictionary. But, do I agree with Arendt's use of that term? Yes and no. Hitler's inner circle were extraordinarily ordinary men, not gifted with either intellect or extensive education (excepting perhaps Albert Speer). And yet, these men were truly gifted in their collective hatred and paranoia ...of just about everything and everyone. But, there were special orcs, even within the circle of Hitler's closest minions. This is the story of one of the worst: Hitler’s favorite orc. All right. You caught me. That orc is actually from the World of Warcraft. OK. Let me introduce you to this f...
What images come to your mind, when you dream of the American West, Dear Reader? Something like this? I know that this is one of the more recognized fantasies about the western experience. Hopefully by now, we all know that this depiction is COMPLETE bulls*&t. THERE WERE ALREADY PEOPLE THERE, FOLKS. When I think of the American western experience, I always have these images in my head: For my druthers, I prefer pictures like the above. Images that compel impressions of space and wild beauty. Buffalo, coupled (of course) with that endless sky. Whenever I think about the American West, I think poetically. I think tectonically. It's impossible to gage this landscape against the span of a single human life. But, that is essentially what we have to do here, isn't it Dear Reader? We must create condensed sketches of larger events, even if those happenings are tragic in nature. Which brings us to Sand Creek. The events surrounding the M...
Comments
Post a Comment